
I had the class time changed to 110 minutes twice a week for fall 2005. I redesigned the course to enhance students' learning of course materials by making more efficient use of class time. Students had to do more preparation before class, so that class time could be dedicated to discussing readings. I used PowerPoint to go over main issues in the readings. With more class time, I was also able to have students watch and discuss documentaries to further enhance learning.
In fall 2006, I kept the class time meeting twice per week. I changed some assignments’ point value, developed more in-class tasks, gave students a grading rubric before they completed assignments, and handed out detailed instructions for the oral presentations.
| ImplementationThe changes I made in fall 2006 were based on my personal evaluation of what went well and what could be better. These changes were motivated mainly by my wish to provide a very clear structure and as much guidance as possible. My first change was to be sure students read assigned material before each class. I also graded the questions that students answered in the first minutes of class, because students relied a little too much on PowerPoint presentations. Next, I wanted to emphasize student work that showed a deep understanding of course material. Less credit was given for the two knowledge-based tests, and more credit was given for the four writing assignments. I also provided a rubric and designed guidelines for oral presentations to clarify my expectations and help students perform better. Finally, since the number of students was considerably lower in fall 2006, we went through material faster. Consequently, I developed some new engaging in-class activities since discussing photographs, paintings, and newspaper articles proved very fruitful the last course offering.
| Student PerformanceIn fall 2006, the averages for papers and tests were higher than in 2005, but they lacked the exceptional excellence that a few students showed the year before. Part of this difference may be due to my handing out the rubrics for the four papers beforehand in order to give students an idea of what was expected. I also gave students a handout for the presentations and found their presentations to be much better; students came more prepared to lead a class discussion and they used more appropriate sources. In addition, I found that these students were better prepared for the readings.
| ReflectionsIn fall 2006, I started grading the answers to the questions that the students answered in the first minutes of class, as additional encouragement to do the readings. However, I noticed that some students still did not do the readings unless I announced a quiz. I am not sure what other actions I can take to encourage students to complete the readings. Overall, I am satisfied with the course and will keep the course how it is but incorporate new materials since culture is a dynamic phenomenon and societies change rapidly.
| Summary
